Pro-Benita • Freedom-focused • Updated September 10, 2026
Stand with Benita Pedersen
This site documents the Alberta Human Rights Tribunal proceeding concerning Benita’s political flyer, distributed during a public debate about a rainbow crosswalk in Westlock. It supports Benita, defends the freedom to speak and debate, and brings the public record, reporting and interviews together in one place.
This advocacy and information site summarizes a legal proceeding and links official sources. It is not an official Tribunal publication or legal advice. Check CanLII for later orders or findings.
Official schedule
Eight scheduled hearing days
The official schedule lists Laurie Hodge v. All Fired Up Event Services in the publications area. The listed grounds are gender expression, gender identity and sexual orientation.
Official Commission and Tribunal information
Use the Commission website for the live hearing schedule and official instructions. Published written decisions are collected on CanLII.
How to participate as a public observer
Request the videoconference link from the Tribunal Office
Include your full name and the date or dates you want to attend. Confirm that you will not record or broadcast the hearing and will not interrupt or participate in the proceeding.
Read the primary documents
The complaint and the municipal bylaw
These are the underlying documents, not summaries. The complaint records allegations that the Tribunal will consider; it is not a finding. Westlock’s later bylaw came from a separate municipal process.
Alberta Human Rights Commission • 10 pages
Redacted Human Rights Complaint
Received June 19, 2023. Read the allegations, requested resolution and attached flyer pages in the public redacted copy.
Town of Westlock • Bylaw 2023-14 • 2 pages
Crosswalk and Flagpole Bylaw
Passed March 11, 2024 after the February 22 plebiscite. The bylaw requires standard white-striped crosswalks and says existing non-compliant crosswalks are not grandfathered.
Two records, two processes: the complaint concerns Benita’s 2023 flyer. Bylaw 2023-14 records the later municipal vote and Council process. The bylaw is related community context, not part of the Human Rights Tribunal complaint.
Why this matters
Political disagreement belongs in public debate
The defence position is straightforward: Albertans should be free to express opinions about controversial public questions without government punishment for the expression itself. The Tribunal will decide the legal issues. The public should be able to follow the case, examine the sources and discuss what it means for freedom of expression.
Read the latest defence update from JCCF →
September 8, 2026
Alberta woman faces eight-day human rights hearing over rainbow crosswalk flyer
Start here
Read, watch and follow
Defence update
JCCF: eight-day Tribunal hearing
JCCF reports that its funded lawyers are representing Benita and that as many as 15 witnesses may be involved.
Read at JCCFPublic access
How to attend the videoconference
Use the official requirements and a copy-ready email to request the hearing link.
Open the attendance guideFull collection
Articles, podcasts, videos and public posts
The media hub includes every source Kevin supplied, plus official records and additional coverage located during research.
Browse the media hub
Official Town of Westlock website photo
Did you know?
The community debate continued on a separate civic track
After the 2023 crosswalk debate, a resident-initiated petition was verified, Council sent the proposed Crosswalk and Flagpole Bylaw to a binding plebiscite, and a majority voted “Yes” on February 22, 2024.
Related context, separate process: these municipal events concern the same local subject matter, but they are not part of the legal Human Rights Tribunal proceeding about Benita’s flyer.
Explore both timelines
Support the defence of freedom
Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms
JCCF reports that Justice Centre-funded lawyers are representing Benita. Its work is funded by voluntary donations. A general donation supports the Justice Centre’s broader civil-liberties work and may not be restricted to this case.